Discuss your project

Phoenix MECase studyLondon’s largest fit-out, for a blue-chip client

One fit-out. Four systems. Every register live.

Phoenix ME delivers the mechanical and electrical package on the largest fit-out in London, for a blue-chip client. EngVision runs its digital engineering: the drawing register, the asset data, the QR tagging programme and the site instruction log. Most started as spreadsheet work done by hand.

1,877
drawings tracked through approval, construction and as-built
22,897
live assets tracked for QR tagging, checked hourly for new exports
603
instructions raised in ClickUp, each assigned to an engineer

Counts read from the London fit-out project records between June and September 2026.

What runs on site today.

The time savings are modelled. Each has its assumption beside it, so you can check the arithmetic against your own project.

  1. 01Drawing and Model Control

    Drawing progress dashboard

    Before

    The drawing position came from a tracker whose largest sheet alone carried nearly 248,000 formulas. It hung on open.

    Now

    That tracker now feeds the approval, construction and as-built dashboards. Each shows the pipeline stage tree and who is holding what, alongside an S-curve against programme. The dashboards have since been ported to two more Phoenix projects.

    1. Done

      Tracker refreshed

      The drawing register feeds the dashboards.

    2. Done

      Approval dashboard

      The stage tree shows who is holding what.

    3. Done

      Construction dashboard

      The same register at the construction stage.

    4. Done

      As-built dashboard

      The last stage, closing the register out.

    5. Done

      S-curve against programme

      Progress read against the programme.

    1,877
    drawings on the project register
    3
    projects now on the same dashboards

    Excel with Office.js automation. Briefing decks built from the live data.

    Modelled saving

    About 2.5 hours a week

    Modelled on three hours to compile the report by hand each week against thirty minutes to refresh and read the dashboards. Not a measured figure.

  2. 02Services

    Site instruction automation

    Before

    Every site instruction started with someone opening the document platform to download each attachment. Then they had to file it, log a row in the CAD instruction workbook, add the link and raise the task. Hundreds of instructions, one at a time.

    Now

    A daily run scans for new instructions, files every attachment into the SharePoint tree, writes the workbook row and link, and proposes a ClickUp task for each one, assigned to the responsible engineers. Larger batches wait for approval. The outcome goes back into the workbook the project team reads.

    1. Done

      Daily scan

      The run looks for new site instructions.

    2. Done

      File the attachments

      Every attachment lands in the SharePoint tree.

    3. Done

      Write the workbook row

      The row and its link go into the instruction workbook.

    4. Waiting for approval

      Larger batch waits for approval

      A larger batch holds here until someone approves it.

    5. Waiting

      Propose the tasks

      One task per instruction, for the responsible engineers.

    6. Waiting

      Back into the workbook

      The outcome returns to the workbook the project team reads.

    22
    instructions and 97 files handled in one batch
    359
    of 603 assigned instructions evaluated by engineers

    Headless browser, Python, ClickUp API, SharePoint sync, scheduled and verified end to end.

    Modelled saving

    1.5 to 4 hours per batch

    Modelled on twelve minutes per instruction by hand (download, file, log, link, task) for batches of 9 to 22 instructions, against fifteen minutes reviewing exceptions. Not a measured figure.

  3. 03Asset data dashboard

    Asset data dashboard

    Before

    The asset register arrives as spreadsheet exports. Checking them by hand against the data specification means sampling.

    Now

    Exports and model imports are validated against rules drawn from the specification. The dashboard shows completion and outstanding work, with heatmaps of missing data. Each asset record has cell-level locking and an audit trail.

    1. Done

      Export or model import

      Spreadsheet exports and model imports arrive.

    2. Done

      Validate against the rules

      Rules drawn from the data specification.

    3. Done

      Completion and outstanding work

      Heatmaps show where data is missing.

    4. Done

      Locked record, audited

      Cell-level locking and an audit trail on each asset record.

    37,937
    active assets in the register, June 2026
    Audited
    cell-level edits to asset records, with locking

    Next.js, Postgres with the rules in the database, IFC parsed on the server.

    Modelled saving

    About 630 hours per full check

    Modelled on a person checking each of the 37,937 rows by hand at one minute a row, against a validation run that checks them all. Not a measured figure.

  4. 04QR Asset Tagging

    QR tagging progress site

    Before

    The client needs to see how much of the fit-out is tagged and signed off. The field team needs to know what is behind. The position came from a loader script run by Windows Task Scheduler on one machine.

    Now

    A progress page for the client and a site-work view for the field team, checked hourly in the cloud for new model exports. It shows tagging and sign-off by level, core and category, and what is behind. It also shows which tags point at assets that have left the model.

    1. Hourly

      Cloud check for exports

      The job looks for new model exports.

    2. Done

      Reconcile the exports

      Tagging and sign-off by level, core and category.

    3. Done

      Client progress page

      How much of the fit-out is tagged and signed off.

    4. Done

      Site-work view

      What is behind.

    5. Done

      Tags without an asset

      Tags that point at assets which have left the model.

    8
    master model exports reconciled whenever one changes
    Hourly
    check for new exports, from the cloud

    Static React, Postgres, a Python loader on a scheduled cloud job.

    Modelled saving

    About 2.5 hours a week

    Modelled on a person assembling the same position by hand for the client and the site team, thirty minutes each working day, five days a week. The tool itself replaced a script on one machine, so this is the manual equivalent. Not a measured figure.

Read it away from the screen.

The editorial version carries the same counts, workflows and assumptions as this page, from the same source.

Bring us the register that is holding you up.

Tell us which spreadsheet the team is fighting and what it needs to show. We’ll say what we’d build and how long it takes.

Discuss a similar challenge